peopleanalyst

Research substrate

Insight Cards

Atomic quantitative findings from the research underlying the magazine and the AI Human Interaction Guide. Each card carries a single headline finding, full source attribution, methodology, and framing claims. Cards cite into longer editorial work by ID.

hr-techQ7to verify

Brynjolfsson, Li, Raymond 2023 (NBER) — generative AI lifts customer-support productivity ~14% with largest gains for novices

In a staggered rollout of a generative-AI-based conversational assistant at a large customer-support contact center, average productivity (issues resolved per hour) rose by approximately 14% post-adoption, with the largest gains concentrated among less-experienced and lower-skilled workers — partly because the AI assistant diffused the conversational patterns of high-performers to lower-performers in real time.

Issues resolved per hour (customer-support agent productivity)Approximately 14% average productivity gain post-adoption; largest gains for less-experienced / lower-skilled workers, much smaller gains for top performers.
Sample
Staggered rollout at a large customer-support contact center; exact agent N and call N not extracted to verification.
Methodology
Quasi-experimental staggered-adoption analysis with pre/post and treatment/control comparisons; productivity measured via objective issues-resolved-per-hour telemetry.

What this means

  • The cleanest mid-2020s field-experiment result on generative AI productivity gains in real workflow conditions — directly cited in nearly every adoption-vs-productivity discussion.
  • Heterogeneous effects (novices benefit more than experts) is the load-bearing finding: it predicts where AI substitution operates first and where senior judgment remains differentiating.
  • Provides a transaction-cost-economics-compatible reading: AI lowered search + drafting costs for routine customer interactions (low asset specificity), with steepest gains where prior human variance was largest.

Source

Generative AI at Work

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper w31161 · Erik Brynjolfsson et al. · 2023 · peer-reviewed

Context

What came before
Pre-2023 generative-AI productivity claims were largely vendor-anecdotal or based on small controlled-task experiments. The Brynjolfsson NBER paper was the first large-scale field-quasi-experiment on real workflow productivity.
What comes next
Verify exact N (agents + calls), exact methodology of issue-resolution measurement, and exact heterogeneity effects by tenure decile. Connect to the 2025 66-firm field experiment (much narrower individual-level effects) — together they suggest the customer-support setting was an unusually favorable case rather than a generalizable template.
Where this lands
Encyclopedia Part I §1.3 (methodology — what we actually have evidence for), Part II (workforce — novice/expert heterogeneity), Part III (CX — direct domain application).
← AI Human Interaction Guide