01
Who this is for
The committee that must choose a posture, not admire the analysis
- — jobs vs market
- — levels
- — protected classes
Client-insight readout · DS-7+1 · assembled by the engine
The Comp Review
Position, drift, equity — then the scenarios and the recommendation.
Illustrative — the chart is a designed canonical scene (the platonic form a confirmed story presents as), not a specific client’s data. With real data, the engine selects the matching scene and toggles the client’s reality against it.
02
The decision on the table
Where are we against the market, is anything drifting or unfair — and which option do we fund?
03
What we believed walking in
The quiet worry that the next offer lost or the next equity audit will reveal a posture we can't defend.
04
What the data shows
Market position evidenced job-by-job; drift decomposed by driver; the scenarios costed on your assumptions.
05
What it means for you
Pay is the clearest sentence a company ever says about what it values — it shouldn't be written by accident.
06
The move
A funded comp posture with its rationale on the record.
- — See the true posture (position, drift, structure)
- — Cost the honest options (Models I/II/III)
- — Choose one and write the rationale on the record
07
Act / don't act
If ignored: Defer and drift keeps writing the posture for you — collected in lost offers, quiet inequities, and a committee meeting that gets harder every year. — If acted: A funded posture with its reasoning on the record.
08
The honest close
What next? What else?
- — job-level pricing on the exposed roles
- — equity deep-dive
- — next-cycle calibration