Commercial Computer-Based Deductive Reasoning Test
Reliability & validity
Reliability & validity evidence is syncing from Principia.
Sources
- SHL
Deploy it
The full item bank and survey deployment live in the People Analytics Toolbox (the enterprise survey-item library), with the min-N privacy gate.
What the literature says
The measurement literature behind this signal — sourced, so you can defend it.
“T. (2013). Two minds rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 20 , 129–46. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious . London: Penguin. Nickerson, R. S. (2007). Aspects of rationality: Reflections on what it means to be rational and whether we are . New…”
— Thinkingandreasoningaveryshortintroductimatch 48%
“Need we worry about such things? What happens when the IRT model we normally use is inappropriate? In Chapter 9 , Neil Dorans, Bert Green, Robert Mislevy, Lynne Steinberg, David Thissen and I discuss the exciting challenges that still lie before us. THE STRUCTURE AND USE OF A…”
— computerized_adaptive_testingmatch 47%
“The counter-argument is that they did have the same chance to show their ability to handle hard questions, and they “blew” it. There is no point in asking a question about compound interest of someone who cannot correctly compute simple interest. So long as a single dominant…”
— computerized_adaptive_testingmatch 47%
Resources: Thinkingandreasoningaveryshortintroducti · computerized_adaptive_testing