peopleanalyst

library / lib83ce021c288e7718

Sprint_ How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days

In a sentence

A step-by-step playbook for running a five-day 'sprint' that lets teams answer their most important questions by prototyping and testing ideas with real customers before committing significant time and money.

Sprint distills the methods Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, and Braden Kowitz developed and refined across 100+ engagements at Google Ventures into a practical, day-by-day guide for solving big problems fast. Instead of endless meetings, churning email, and months-long projects built on untested assumptions, a sprint compresses the work into a single focused week: Monday you map the problem and pick a target, Tuesday you sketch competing solutions, Wednesday you decide which to test, Thursday you build a realistic façade-style prototype, and Friday you put it in front of five target customers and learn. Rich with stories—a hotel-delivery robot, a coffee company's online store, a cancer-trial matching tool, fitness software, and workplace messaging—the book shows that any challenge, no matter how large, can benefit because you solve the surface first and learn the hard way without the hard way. It's a book for experts and beginners alike who have a big opportunity or problem and need to start with confidence.

The four lenses

  • Science
  • Statistics
  • Systems
  • Strategy

Tags

applied-statisticscreativity-inventionstrategy

The model

A causal framework in which structured design levers and team conditions produce focused team states (shared understanding, concrete solutions, honest customer reactions) that drive validated learning and confident decisions, ultimately reducing risk and accelerating progress toward business goals.

Big Challenge Selectiondesign lever

The deliberate choice to focus the sprint on a high-stakes, time-pressured, or stuck problem that is important enough to justify the team's full energy and attention for a week.

Decider Engagementdesign lever

The active, authoritative participation of an empowered decision-maker (or delegate) who provides vision, criteria, and makes binding choices throughout the sprint rather than ceding authority to consensus.

Team Diversity and Expertisedesign lever

The composition of a small (seven or fewer) cross-functional team that includes the people who build the product plus extra experts and troublemakers, ensuring distributed knowledge is available in the room.

Focused Time and Spacecontextual condition

The structural conditions of a cleared five-day calendar, six-hour timeboxed days, a no-devices rule, and a whiteboard-rich room that eliminate fragmentation and concentrate attention on a single challenge.

Problem Framing and Targetbehavioral pattern

The Monday output of a long-term goal, sprint questions, a customer-centric map, and a single chosen target customer and moment that aligns the team and directs all subsequent effort.

Shared Understandingpsychological state

The team psychological state of common, aligned comprehension of the problem, customer, opportunity, and risk built through expert interviews, How Might We notes, mapping, and the visible 'shared brain' of the whiteboards.

Concrete Solution Generationbehavioral pattern

The Tuesday activity of individuals working alone together to transform abstract ideas into detailed, self-explanatory solution sketches that can be fairly evaluated without sales pitches.

Structured Decision Makingbehavioral pattern

The Wednesday sticky-decision process (art museum, heat map, speed critique, straw poll, supervote) plus Rumble logic that produces crisp, low-debate choices reflecting team priorities while avoiding groupthink.

Realistic Prototype (Façade)behavioral pattern

The Thursday output of a Goldilocks-quality, disposable façade built in one day that appears real enough to evoke honest reactions while requiring minimal investment.

Customer Testing with Five Usersdesign lever

The Friday practice of conducting Five-Act Interviews with five target customers, watched together by the team, to elicit honest reactions and the 'why' behind them.

Validated Learningpsychological state

The team state of insight gained from observing genuine customer reactions—identifying patterns of success and failure—that answers sprint questions and reveals the 'why' before expensive commitment.

Confident Next-Step Decisionoutcome metric

The outcome of the team and Decider knowing, with evidence, whether and how to proceed—classified as efficient failure or flawed success—and what to build or fix next.

Risk Reduction and Progress Toward Goaloutcome metric

The ultimate business outcome of saving time and money by avoiding wrong paths and accelerating real-world success toward the long-term goal, measured by downstream results like adoption or sales growth.

How they connect

  • big challenge selection influences problem framing and target
  • team diversity and expertise predicts shared understanding
  • focused time and space influences concrete solution generation
  • problem framing and target predicts shared understanding
  • shared understanding predicts concrete solution generation
  • concrete solution generation predicts structured decision making
  • decider engagement moderates structured decision making
  • structured decision making predicts realistic prototype
  • realistic prototype mediates validated learning
  • customer testing predicts validated learning
  • validated learning predicts confident next step
  • confident next step predicts risk reduction and progress

The process

The book outlines a highly structured, five-day process called a Design Sprint, designed to solve critical business problems through rapid prototyping and user testing. The overall playbook begins with a crucial preparation phase, where a significant challenge is chosen, a dedicated team is assembled with clearly defined roles (including a Decider and Facilitator), and the logistical and environmental requirements for the sprint week are secured. This setup ensures the team is focused and empowered to make progress. The core of the playbook is the five-day sprint itself, with each day dedicated to a specific stage of the problem-solving journey. Monday is for understanding the problem by setting a long-term goal and mapping the challenge. Tuesday focuses on generating a wide range of potential solutions through structured sketching exercises. On Wednesday, the team critiques the solutions and the Decider makes a firm choice on what to prototype. Thursday is dedicated to building a realistic-looking but simple prototype—a facade of the final product. Finally, Friday is for testing that prototype with real target customers to gain immediate, actionable feedback. This methodology compresses months of potential debate and development into a single week, replacing abstract discussions with tangible data from user interactions. By starting with the end in mind, generating diverse solutions, making decisive choices, and testing a realistic prototype, the playbook provides a reliable way for teams to learn, validate ideas, and find the right path forward before committing significant time and resources.

Design Sprint Preparation

To set the stage for a successful design sprint by selecting the right challenge, assembling an effective team, and preparing the environment for focused work.

When to use: Before a design sprint begins, when a high-stakes problem has been identified that requires a focused, rapid solution.

  1. Step 1Identify a significant and worthy challenge for the sprint to address.

    Entry: An organizational need or opportunity has been recognized.

    Exit: A specific, high-stakes challenge is selected for the sprint.

    • Choosing which challenge to address.

    In: Organizational challenges · Out: A defined sprint challenge

    ch03 · ch07

  2. Step 2Designate a Decider and secure their commitment to participate.

    Entry: The sprint challenge is defined.

    Exit: A Decider is assigned and has committed to being available for the sprint.

    • Who will be the Decider.
    • The level of the Decider's involvement (full-time or key moments).

    In: List of project stakeholders · Out: Committed Decider

    ch03 · ch08

  3. Step 3Assign a Facilitator to manage time, conversations, and the overall sprint process.

    Entry: The sprint is being planned.

    Exit: A Facilitator is assigned.

    • Who will be the Facilitator.

    In: Team roster · Out: Assigned Facilitator

    ch03 · ch08

  4. Step 4Assemble a diverse sprint team of seven or fewer people.

    Entry: The challenge, Decider, and Facilitator are in place.

    Exit: A cross-functional team of the appropriate size is formed.

    • Determining the makeup of the sprint team.

    In: List of available experts · Out: A well-structured sprint team

    ch03 · ch08

  5. Step 5Schedule five full, consecutive days for the sprint and block calendars.

    Entry: The team has been assembled.

    Exit: A five-day period is reserved in all team members' calendars.

    In: Team member availability · Out: Scheduled sprint week

    ch03 · ch09

  6. Step 6Choose an appropriate environment and gather necessary supplies.

    Entry: The sprint is scheduled.

    Exit: A suitable room is booked and stocked with supplies.

    In: List of required supplies · Out: Prepared sprint room

    ch03 · ch09

  7. Step 7Establish and communicate a 'no-device' rule during sprint hours.

    Entry: The team is assembled and the sprint is about to begin.

    Exit: The team agrees to the no-device rule.

    In: Team agreement · Out: A focused work environment

    ch09

The Five-Day Design Sprint

To progress from a critical business problem to a tested solution in five days by mapping the problem, sketching solutions, deciding on a direction, building a realistic prototype, and testing it with real customers.

When to use: During the scheduled five-day period after the sprint has been prepared.

  1. Step 1Day 1: Start at the end by defining and agreeing on a long-term goal.

    Entry: The sprint week begins.

    Exit: A clear, agreed-upon long-term goal is documented.

    • Agreeing on the long-term goal.

    In: Sprint challenge · Out: Documented long-term goal

    ch04 · ch10

  2. Step 2Day 1: List sprint questions by imagining the project has failed.

    Entry: The long-term goal is defined.

    Exit: A list of key sprint questions is documented on a whiteboard.

    In: Long-term goal · Out: List of sprint questions

    ch10

  3. Step 3Day 1: Create a map of the customer journey or problem space.

    Entry: Sprint questions are listed.

    Exit: A visual map of the problem is on the whiteboard.

    • Determining which actors and steps are most critical to include.

    In: Team insights · Out: A visual problem map

    ch04 · ch11

  4. Step 4Day 1: Interview experts from the team and organization.

    Entry: The initial map is drafted.

    Exit: Expert interviews are complete and insights are captured.

    • Choosing which experts to interview.

    In: List of experts, Draft map and questions · Out: Updated map and questions, Expert insights

    ch04 · ch12

  5. Step 5Day 1: Capture opportunities using 'How Might We' (HMW) notes.

    Entry: Expert interviews are in progress.

    Exit: A collection of HMW notes is generated.

    In: Insights from interviews · Out: Organized 'How Might We' notes

    ch12

  6. Step 6Day 1: Choose a target for the sprint.

    Entry: Expert interviews and HMW note-taking are complete.

    Exit: A single, clear target for the sprint is chosen and communicated.

    • The Decider's choice of the target customer and event.

    In: The map, Organized HMW notes · Out: A defined sprint target

    ch04 · ch13

  7. Step 7Day 2: Gather inspiration with Lightning Demos.

    Entry: Tuesday morning begins.

    Exit: A whiteboard is filled with 10-20 inspiring ideas.

    In: Team members' research on inspiring products · Out: A collection of inspiring ideas

    ch14

  8. Step 8Day 2: Generate solutions with the Four-Step Sketch process.

    Entry: Inspiration has been gathered.

    Exit: Each team member has produced a detailed, anonymous solution sketch.

    In: All information from Day 1, Ideas from Lightning Demos · Out: A set of detailed solution sketches

    ch05 · ch14 · ch15

  9. Step 9Day 3: Decide on the best solution using the Sticky Decision process.

    Entry: Solution sketches are complete.

    Exit: One or more winning solutions are selected for prototyping.

    • The Decider's final choice of which solution(s) to prototype.

    In: Solution sketches · Out: Selected ideas for prototyping

    ch06 · ch16

  10. Step 10Day 3: Create a storyboard to plan the prototype.

    Entry: A winning solution has been chosen.

    Exit: A complete storyboard is drawn on the whiteboard, serving as a blueprint for the prototype.

    • Choosing the opening scene.
    • Deciding which steps to include in the user journey.

    In: Winning solution sketch(es) · Out: A detailed storyboard

    ch06 · ch18

  11. Step 11Day 4: Adopt a 'prototype mindset' and choose the right tools.

    Entry: Thursday morning begins; the storyboard is complete.

    Exit: The team is aligned on the prototyping approach and has selected their tools.

    • Deciding which tool is best suited for the prototype.

    In: Storyboard · Out: Prototyping tool selection

    ch19 · ch20

  12. Step 12Day 4: Build the prototype using a 'divide and conquer' approach.

    Entry: Tools have been chosen.

    Exit: A realistic, high-fidelity prototype is built and ready for testing.

    • Assigning team members to specific roles.

    In: Storyboard, Prototyping tools · Out: A completed prototype

    ch19 · ch20

  13. Step 13Day 5: Conduct five one-on-one user interviews.

    Entry: Friday morning begins; the prototype is complete and five customers are scheduled.

    Exit: Five user interviews have been completed.

    In: Completed prototype, Recruited target customers · Out: Raw user feedback and observations

    ch21 · ch22

  14. Step 14Day 5: The team observes interviews and captures feedback.

    Entry: Interviews are underway.

    Exit: The whiteboard is filled with categorized, real-time feedback from all five interviews.

    In: Live interview feed · Out: Organized customer feedback

    ch21 · ch23

  15. Step 15Day 5: Synthesize learnings and identify patterns.

    Entry: All interviews are complete.

    Exit: A prioritized list of feedback patterns and clear next steps are defined.

    • Deciding which patterns are most significant.
    • Determining the next steps for the project.

    In: Whiteboard of interview notes, Sprint questions · Out: Actionable insights, Validated or invalidated hypotheses

    ch23

Note-and-Vote

To efficiently gather ideas from the team and reach a decision quickly without lengthy debate.

When to use: At any point during a sprint when a group decision is needed quickly and democratically.

  1. Step 1Team members silently write down their ideas on paper.

    Entry: A decision needs to be made.

    Exit: Each member has a list of their own ideas.

    In: A specific problem or question · Out: Individual lists of ideas

    ch17

  2. Step 2Each member self-edits their list to their top ideas.

    Entry: Initial ideas are written down.

    Exit: Each member has selected their best one or two ideas.

    In: Individual lists of ideas · Out: Prioritized individual ideas

    ch17

  3. Step 3Write everyone's top ideas on a whiteboard.

    Entry: Individuals have prioritized their ideas.

    Exit: A master list of ideas is visible on the whiteboard.

    In: Prioritized individual ideas · Out: A consolidated list of ideas

    ch17

  4. Step 4Conduct a quiet vote on the ideas.

    Entry: The consolidated list is on the whiteboard.

    Exit: Each member has made a final choice.

    In: A consolidated list of ideas · Out: Individual votes

    ch17

  5. Step 5The Decider makes the final decision.

    Entry: Voting is complete and results are visible.

    Exit: A final decision is made and communicated.

    • The Decider's final choice.

    In: Voting results · Out: A final decision

    ch17

A candidate measure

Sprint_ How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days — derived measurement candidates

Big Challenge Selection

perceived stakes/urgency rating; strategic importance judgment

self-report suitability: high

Decider Engagement

presence at key sessions; reversal rate of decisions

self-report suitability: high

Team Diversity and Expertise

role coverage count; team size

self-report suitability: medium

Focused Time and Space

days blocked; observed distraction incidents

self-report suitability: high

Problem Framing and Target

artifact completeness; alignment of target with sprint questions

self-report suitability: high

Shared Understanding

convergence of member responses; perceived clarity

self-report suitability: high

Concrete Solution Generation

number of sketches; comprehension rate during critique

self-report suitability: medium

Structured Decision Making

time-to-decision; number of debate detours

self-report suitability: medium

Realistic Prototype (Façade)

trial-run defect count; perceived realism rating

self-report suitability: low

Customer Testing with Five Users

screening match rate; interviews completed

self-report suitability: medium

Validated Learning

count of patterns seen by 3+ customers; question-resolution count

self-report suitability: high

Confident Next-Step Decision

decision clarity rating; follow-up action taken

self-report suitability: high

Risk Reduction and Progress Toward Goal

sales growth rate; adoption counts; estimated cost/time saved

self-report suitability: low

Run the assessment

The story

The reader An entrepreneur, team leader, or maker with a bold vision who wants to deliver an idea, product, or service to the world and make their time at work count.

External problem

They face a big, high-stakes problem and don't know where to focus effort, how to start, or whether their idea will actually work.

Internal problem

They feel stuck, overwhelmed by churn—endless email, slipping deadlines, meetings—and anxious that their effort isn't going toward what matters most.

Philosophical problem

Work shouldn't be wasted on questionable assumptions and unproductive debate; people's limited time should count and make a real difference in customers' lives.

The plan

  1. Set the stage: pick a challenge, get a Decider, recruit a diverse seven-person team, and clear five days.
  2. Monday: start at the end, map the problem, ask experts, and pick a target.
  3. Tuesday: find inspiration and sketch competing solutions individually.
  4. Wednesday: decide on the best solutions and build a storyboard.
  5. Thursday: build a realistic façade prototype.
  6. Friday: interview five target customers and learn from their reactions.

Success

  • You make rapid, focused progress and know within a week whether you're on the right track.
  • You get clear customer data and confidence before committing months and money.
  • Your team becomes a problem-solving machine with shared understanding and better, faster decisions.
  • Work becomes meaningful—building things that matter to real people.

At stake

  • You stay stuck in churn, burning months and money on untested assumptions.
  • Risky ideas fail expensively in the real world after you're too committed to change.
  • Endless debate and groupthink lead to mediocre or no decisions.
  • Your bold vision never reaches the world.

Chapter by chapter

  1. ch03Set the Stage

    This chapter argues that effective problem-solving begins with a clear understanding of the challenge and assembling the right team in an optimal environment.

  2. ch04Monday

    This chapter concentrates on establishing a concrete framework for kick-starting a productive workweek by emphasizing the importance of setting long-term goals and targeted actions.

    • Starting with a clear long-term goal is crucial for guiding effective week-to-week operations.
    • Mapping challenges visually can reveal solutions that may not be immediately apparent, fostering collaborative problem-solving.
    • Engaging with experts within your team is essential to harness a range of insights and abilities that contribute to identifying obstacles.
    • A targeted sprint focus can dramatically enhance productivity by minimizing distractions and realigning efforts with significant objectives.
  3. ch05Tuesday

    This chapter focuses on the importance of remixing and improving upon existing ideas rather than relying solely on original concepts, urging professionals to sketch detailed solutions to foster innovation.

  4. ch06Wednesday

    In the quest for innovation, Wednesday's process emphasizes structured decision-making, the vitality of competing ideas, and a clear storyboard to ensure that prototypes effectively address user needs while avoiding the pitfalls of groupthink.

    • Structured decision-making can unlock hidden potential in a wealth of ideas, preventing groupthink.
    • Keeping competing ideas alive is essential; they may yield innovative solutions that refine or even revolutionize initial concepts.
    • Visual storyboarding provides clarity, ensuring that every concept aligns with user needs and scenarios.
    • Embracing diverse opinions fosters a culture of creativity, leading to more robust solutions.
  5. ch07Challenge

    This chapter explores how the Blue Bottle Coffee team leveraged a design sprint to navigate the complexities of launching an online store, transforming a significant business challenge into an opportunity for innovation.

  6. ch08Team

    A successful sprint requires the right mix of team members, led by a decisive leader, to navigate complex challenges efficiently.

  7. ch09Time and Space

    In a world of constant interruptions and fragmented attention, this chapter argues for the structured approach of design sprints to reclaim productivity and foster meaningful work.

    • Fragmented attention due to constant interruptions is a significant barrier to workplace productivity.
    • A well-structured design sprint provides a critical framework for professionals to reclaim focus and facilitate meaningful work outcomes.
    • The no-device rule in a sprint environment enhances collective focus and prioritizes engagement among team members.
    • Ample writing space, such as large whiteboards, is essential for visualizing ideas and fostering creative collaboration.
  8. ch10Start at the End

    This chapter emphasizes the importance of establishing a clear long-term goal and addressing potential pitfalls before diving into problem-solving, drawing inspiration from the Apollo 13 mission's structured approach in crisis.

    • Clear, aligned goals are central to a successful project; take the time on day one to define what you want to achieve.
    • Embracing potential failure scenarios helps teams address assumptions upfront, reducing the risks of misalignment later.
    • Transforming fears into questions fosters a mindset shift from anxiety to curiosity, paving the way for innovative solutions.
    • Achieving clarity about long-term goals can yield greater satisfaction and productivity during the sprint.
  9. ch11Map

    Creating a simple map to visualize complex business challenges can significantly improve understanding and streamline processes, much like how a physical map guides readers through the intricate world of "The Lord of the Rings."

  10. ch12Ask the Experts

    This chapter argues that assembling a diverse pool of expert insights is essential for tackling complex challenges, emphasizing that distributed knowledge across a team can significantly enhance understanding and solution-generation.

  11. ch13Target

    This chapter discusses the process of identifying a critical focus for a design sprint, emphasizing the importance of selecting a specific customer and key moment around which all subsequent project work revolves.

  12. ch14Remix and Improve

    This chapter argues that true innovation often arises from remixing and improving existing ideas rather than attempting to create something entirely new, emphasizing a structured approach to gather inspirations through techniques like Lightning Demos.

    • True innovation often stems from remixing existing ideas and perspectives rather than beginning with a blank slate.
    • Lightning Demos enable teams to gather inspiration and insights efficiently while encouraging cross-domain thinking.
    • There is immense value in exploring abandoned ideas within companies, as they may hold the key to breakthroughs in current challenges.
    • Creative collaboration thrives on collecting diverse influences, expanding the potential for unique solutions.
  13. ch15Sketch

    In this chapter, the focus on sketching as a collaborative and individual tool challenges traditional brainstorming methods, advocating for a structured approach to generating concrete solutions from abstract ideas.

    • Sketching is an essential practice that democratizes idea generation by requiring only basic drawing skills to express complex ideas.
    • Working alone but in parallel leads to more diverse and innovative solutions than traditional group brainstorming.
    • The iterative nature of sketching facilitates the transformation of abstract ideas into well-defined proposals that can be rigorously evaluated.
    • Clear visual communication significantly reduces misunderstandings and misinterpretations among team members, increasing overall productivity.
  14. ch16Decide

    In an era where endless discussions often lead to indecision or dissatisfaction, this chapter presents a structured decision-making process designed to foster efficiency and clarity in team settings.

    • Prolonged discussions often lead to fatigue and indecision, emphasizing the need for structured decision-making in team environments.
    • The Sticky Decision process divides decision-making into five clear steps to enhance efficiency and clarity.
    • Using visual tools such as dot stickers and sticky notes prevents biases and captures team insights meaningfully.
    • It is essential for the Decider to maintain decision-making authority to prevent outcomes dictated solely by group consensus.
  15. ch17Rumble

    This chapter introduces the concept of the "Rumble," a testing method that allows teams to explore multiple conflicting ideas simultaneously through prototyping, enabling data-driven decision-making without premature compromises.

  16. ch18Storyboard

    The process of crafting a detailed storyboard is crucial in ensuring that prototypes not only function well but also resonate with user expectations before the testing phase.

    • A well-crafted storyboard is an essential roadmap for any prototype, preventing overlapping confusion and ensuring clarity in customer interaction.
    • Emulating stories from creative powerhouses like Pixar reveals the significant advantage of early visual planning within any fast-paced development environment.
    • Active collaboration and the efficient appointment of roles—like a designated Decider—propel teams toward more effective outcomes without the drain of collective decision-making fatigue.
    • Templates and existing ideas should be utilized rather than reinventing the wheel in the storyboarding phase, which streamlines the execution of the overall sprint process.
  17. ch19Fake It

    This chapter argues for the pragmatic value of creating a realistic façade or prototype to test ideas quickly, emphasizing the benefits of early feedback over attachment to a long development process.

    • Prototyping doesn’t require perfection; it requires practicality.
    • Early feedback is invaluable; the sooner you get it, the better.
    • A façade can be just as effective as a fully developed product in eliciting user reactions.
    • Teams that practice the “prototype mindset” can outmaneuver those committed to extensive, rigid development processes.
  18. ch20Prototype

    In this chapter, the authors present a structured approach to prototyping that emphasizes the importance of selecting the right tools and effectively collaborating within a diverse team to create a realistic, functional representation of an idea.

  19. ch21Small Data

    This chapter argues for the power of small data, advocating that even a handful of user interviews can reveal critical insights into customer behavior and preferences, as demonstrated through a compelling anecdote about the publishing of Harry Potter.

    • Simple data from just five interviews can reveal 85 percent of user issues, challenging the belief that more extensive research is always necessary.
    • Engaging users directly can provide insights that statistics often mask, revealing the deeper reasons behind user frustrations or successes.
    • The emotional reactions observed during interviews can guide substantive product improvements that are missed in larger, impersonal studies.
    • An incremental approach to user testing allows for faster pivots and more effective designs.
  20. ch22Interview

    This chapter demystifies the art of conducting effective customer interviews, centered around Michael Margolis's structured approach that illuminates user experiences and uncovers critical feedback.

  21. ch23Learn

    The culmination of a design sprint involves gathering insights from real customers, allowing teams to learn rapidly whether their prototypes meet user needs or require swift iteration.

Questions this book answers

How can a team make rapid, meaningful progress on a big problem in just one week?
How do you turn abstract ideas and risky assumptions into testable, concrete solutions?
How do you make good decisions quickly without groupthink or endless debate?
How can you learn whether an idea will work before investing months of time and money?
Who should be in the room, and how should the week be structured to maximize focus?

Glossary

Big Challenge Selection
The choice to direct the sprint at an important, high-stakes, urgent, or stuck problem worthy of the team's full effort.
Decider Engagement
The active, authoritative involvement of an empowered decision-maker who provides vision and makes binding decisions.
Team Diversity and Expertise
The cross-functional makeup and relevant knowledge of a small sprint team.
Focused Time and Space
The structural conditions—cleared week, timeboxed days, no devices, whiteboard-rich room—that concentrate attention.
Problem Framing and Target
The Monday alignment artifacts—long-term goal, sprint questions, map—and the single chosen target customer and moment.
Shared Understanding
Aligned, common comprehension across the team of the problem, customer, opportunity, and risk.
Concrete Solution Generation
The individual creation of detailed, self-explanatory solution sketches that make abstract ideas concrete.
Structured Decision Making
The disciplined Wednesday process for selecting solutions quickly without groupthink.

Related in the library