library / lib91ab8ad9d4ed3708
Handbook of organizational measurement
Price, James L
In a sentence
A foundational handbook designed to standardize and improve the empirical measurement of key concepts in the study of organizations.
The scientific study of organizations is critically hindered by a lack of standardized measures for its core concepts. This fragmentation makes comparing research findings difficult, impeding the generation and verification of robust theory. The Handbook of Organizational Measurement addresses this fundamental problem by systematically compiling, defining, and evaluating existing measures for 22 of the most significant concepts in the field, from Absenteeism and Centralization to Satisfaction and Size. For each concept, the book provides a precise conceptual definition and presents one or more empirically-tested measures, detailing their data collection methods, computation, and available validity and reliability evidence. This handbook is an indispensable reference for researchers and students seeking to conduct rigorous, cumulative science by building on a shared foundation of sound measurement.
The four lenses
- Science
- Statistics
- Systems
- Strategy
Tags
The model
This is not a causal model proposed by the book, but a framework inferred from the book's structure and the relationships discussed in the studies it cites. The book itself is a compendium of measures for 22 key organizational concepts, explicitly stating it does not present a systematic theory. The model organizes these concepts into contextual conditions and design levers that influence psychological states and behavioral patterns, which in turn affect organizational outcomes.
Sizecontextual condition
The scale of operations of a social system, often indicated by the number of personnel, amount of assets, or degree of expenditures.
Autonomycontextual condition
The degree to which a social system has power with respect to its environment, such as in determining its own budget, policies, and procedures.
Mechanizationcontextual condition
The degree to which a social system uses inanimate sources of energy in its operations, from power tools to computers and automated production lines.
Dispersioncontextual condition
The degree to which the membership of a social system is spatially distributed across different physical locations.
Complexitydesign lever
The degree of structural differentiation within a social system, reflected by the number of hierarchical levels, occupational roles, and subunits.
Centralizationdesign lever
The degree to which power is concentrated in a social system, ranging from all power held by one individual to power being exercised equally by all members.
Formalizationdesign lever
The degree to which the norms of a social system are explicit, often indicated by the presence of written rules, procedures, job descriptions, and communication.
Administrative Staffdesign lever
The full-time career members of a social system who perform activities that indirectly contribute to its primary output, such as decision-making, coordination, and control.
Span of Controldesign lever
The number of members managed by the average administrator in a social system.
Routinizationdesign lever
The degree to which role performance in a social system is repetitive and non-uniform.
Distributive Justicedesign lever
The degree to which conformity to the norms of a social system is followed by the receipt of positive sanctions from that system.
Alienationpsychological state
The degree to which the members of a social system believe that their behavior cannot determine the outcomes they seek; a state of subjectively experienced powerlessness.
Satisfactionpsychological state
The degree to which the members of a social system have a positive affective orientation toward membership in the system, often assessed across dimensions like work, pay, supervision, and co-workers.
Motivationpsychological state
The degree to which the members of a social system are willing to work, involving concepts like dedication, effort, and involvement.
Consensuspsychological state
The degree of agreement on values among the members of a social system.
Bases of Powerpsychological state
The source of an individual's capacity to obtain performance from others, such as legitimate, expert, referent, reward, or coercive power.
Communicationbehavioral pattern
The degree to which information is transmitted among the members of a social system, encompassing formal, informal, vertical, and horizontal channels.
Coordinationbehavioral pattern
The degree to which the various interdependent parts of a social system operate according to the requirements of the other parts and of the total system.
Innovationbehavioral pattern
The degree to which a social system is a first or early user of an idea among its set of similar social systems.
Absenteeismbehavioral pattern
The degree to which the members of a social system fail to report for work at the time they are scheduled to work.
Successionbehavioral pattern
The degree of membership movement through the roles of a social system, including internal mobility (promotion) and external mobility (turnover).
Effectivenessoutcome metric
The degree to which a social system achieves its goals.
How they connect
- size → influences complexity
- size − influences administrative staff
- complexity → influences administrative staff
- centralization → influences alienation
- formalization → influences routinization
- satisfaction − influences absenteeism
- satisfaction − influences succession
- coordination → predicts effectiveness
- communication → predicts effectiveness
- bases of power → influences satisfaction
A candidate measure
Handbook of organizational measurement — derived measurement candidates
Absenteeism
Man-days lost rate; Frequency of absence rate
self-report suitability: low
Administrative Staff
A/P Ratio (Administrative / Production personnel); Ratio of non-operatives to total employment; Ratios of specific administrative categories (managerial, professional, clerical) to production personnel.
self-report suitability: none
Alienation
Summated score on a Guttman or Likert scale measuring perceived powerlessness (e.g., Pearlin's scale).
self-report suitability: high
Autonomy
Summated score of the number of key decisions for which authority rests inside the organization (e.g., Aston scale).
self-report suitability: medium
Centralization
Index of Actual Participation (Aiken & Hage); Hierarchy of Authority scale (Aiken & Hage); Control Graph slope (Tannenbaum); Salary concentration ratio (Whisler)
self-report suitability: high
Communication
Ratings of adequacy, amount, frequency, and quality of communication (Georgopoulos & Mann).; Self-recorded frequency of different types of contact (e.g., meetings, phone calls) (Lawler, Porter & Tennenbaum).
self-report suitability: high
Complexity
Number of hierarchical levels in the deepest division.; Mean number of levels for the organization as a whole.; Number of major divisions or departments.; Number of distinct job titles.
self-report suitability: low
Consensus
Standard deviation of scores on a value survey (e.g., Allport-Vernon-Lindzey).
self-report suitability: high
Coordination
Summated rating score of how well different jobs and activities fit together (Georgopoulos & Mann).
self-report suitability: high
Dispersion
Number of operating sites.
self-report suitability: low
Distributive Justice
Summated score of the perceived importance of performance factors in determining pay (Porter & Lawler).
self-report suitability: high
Effectiveness
Rating of overall quality of output (e.g., patient care) by knowledgeable members.; Objective, goal-specific metrics (e.g., rate of return on investment, market share).
self-report suitability: medium
Formalization
Summated score of perceived job codification, rule observation, and specificity (Hage & Aiken).; Summated score of the presence of documented procedures, charts, and job descriptions (Aston Group).
self-report suitability: high
Innovation
Forced-choice adjective comparison score (Forehand).; Index of Interest in Work Innovation (Patchen).; Index of Acceptance of Job Changes (Patchen).
self-report suitability: high
Mechanization
Automation score based on a classification of equipment (Aston Group).; Installed horsepower per wage-earner (Melman).
self-report suitability: low
Motivation
Job Involvement scale score (Lodahl & Kejner).; Job Motivation index score (Patchen).
self-report suitability: high
Bases of Power
Ranking of reasons for compliance (Bachman).
self-report suitability: high
Routinization
Summated score on a scale measuring perceived job variety and uniformity (Hage & Aiken).
self-report suitability: high
Satisfaction
Overall Job Satisfaction Index (Brayfield & Rothe).; Job Descriptive Index (JDI) scores for work, pay, promotions, supervision, and co-workers (Smith, Kendall, & Hulin).; Need fulfillment-deficiency score (Porter & Lawler).
self-report suitability: high
Size
Total number of employees (from payroll printout).; Total assets.; Net sales or annual budget.
self-report suitability: low
Span of Control
Average number of immediate subordinates per manager.; Span of control for the chief executive.
self-report suitability: low
Succession
Average tenure in present position.; Separation rate (turnover rate).; Instability rate.
self-report suitability: medium
The story
The reader A researcher, scholar, or student in organizational studies who wants to conduct rigorous empirical research and contribute to cumulative theory by finding reliable and valid ways to measure key concepts.
External problem
The field lacks standardized, easily accessible measures for core organizational concepts, forcing researchers to constantly reinvent the wheel or use ad-hoc instruments, which makes comparing findings across studies nearly impossible.
Internal problem
The reader feels frustrated and uncertain about how to measure complex concepts rigorously. They worry their findings are artifacts of their measurement choices and that their work will not be cumulative with others in the field.
Philosophical problem
It is fundamentally wrong for a scientific field to be so chaotic in its measurement practices; this disorder prevents the development of robust, verifiable theory and hinders scientific progress.
The plan
- Consult the alphabetically organized chapters to find precise conceptual definitions for the variables in your study.
- Review the presented empirical measure(s), including data collection procedures, computation rules, and known validity/reliability.
- Adopt or adapt these established measures in your own research to promote standardization and comparability.
- Contribute to the field by improving existing measures and developing new ones for neglected concepts.
Success
- The reader's research becomes more rigorous, comparable, and cumulative, allowing them to contribute meaningfully to organizational theory.
- They feel confident in their methodological choices, knowing their work is built on a solid foundation.
- The field of organizational studies moves toward becoming a more mature, quantitative science.
At stake
- Researchers continue to use idiosyncratic measures, making it impossible to compare findings or build cumulative knowledge.
- The field remains fragmented, with little theoretical progress.
- The reader's own research remains methodologically isolated, and its contribution to the broader scientific conversation is uncertain.
Chapter by chapter
ch14p01FORMALIZATION (part 1/3)
This chapter explores the critical need for standardization and improvement of organizational measurement, positing that such measures are vital for the development of a robust organizational theory.
- Standardization of organizational measures is crucial for ensuring that research findings are comparable and reflective of actual organizational realities.
- The improvement of measurement practices must focus on creating composite indices that better capture the multifaceted nature of organizations.
- Validity and reliability in measurement should be paramount concerns for researchers in the organizational field to avoid perpetuating inaccuracies.
- A systemic approach to reviewing and enhancing existing measures can lead to significant advancements in organizational theories and practices.
ch14p02FORMALIZATION (part 2/3)
This chapter explores the dimensions of autonomy and centralization within organizations, emphasizing their implications for power dynamics and decision-making structures.
ch14p03FORMALIZATION (part 3/3)
This chapter explores the concept of formalization within organizations, emphasizing its definition, measurement, and relevance to structures and leadership dynamics.
ch15SPAN OF CONTROL
This chapter explores the concept of span of control in organizational structures and its implications for effective management, proposing a critical reevaluation of traditional models.
- An optimal span of control is not a one-size-fits-all; it must be tailored to the specific context of the organization and the tasks at hand.
- Traditional models suggesting fixed numbers for span of control often fail to capture the complexities of contemporary team environments.
- Broader spans of control can enhance agility and innovation but may require new approaches to leadership and delegation.
- Managers today must cultivate awareness of the dynamics within their teams to effectively navigate spans of control.
ch16EFFECTIVENESS
This chapter explores the concept of effectiveness in organizations, distinguishing it from efficiency and emphasizing the importance of goal identification in measuring success.
- Effectiveness is fundamentally about achieving specific organizational goals, not merely maintaining operational efficiency.
- A rigorous focus on goal identification can significantly enhance an organization's capacity to measure and demonstrate effectiveness.
- Existing tools for assessment require adaptation to cater to the diverse operational landscapes of different sectors.
- Stakeholder engagement is essential; feedback should be sought from all relevant parties to attain a holistic view of organizational effectiveness.
ch17FORMALIZATION
Formalization refers to the explicitness of the norms within a social system, outlining how organizations can either enhance or obscure their operational clarity through the structure and documentation of their procedures.
- Formalization is a multidimensional concept that should not be limited to written documentation; it encompasses the explicitness of organizational norms.
- A high degree of formalization can lead to improved clarity and efficiency within organizations, especially those facing complex tasks.
- The explicit articulation of norms can prevent confusion and enhance employee satisfaction and engagement.
- Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies are essential for measuring formalization accurately, providing comprehensive insights into organizational functioning.
ch19MECHANIZATION
This chapter explores the concept of mechanization, emphasizing its definition as the reliance on inanimate sources of energy in social systems, particularly within organizational structures.
ch20MOTIVATION
This chapter explores the critical distinction between motivation and related concepts such as satisfaction and alienation, asserting that motivation reflects a person's willingness to work, a dimension that can be measured through specific frameworks.
- Motivation is fundamentally distinct from both satisfaction and alienation, each representing different facets of workplace experience.
- Subjective measures, such as job involvement, provide deeper insights into employee motivation than reliance on objective metrics alone.
- The work of Lodahl and Kejner reveals critical correlations between job involvement and self-esteem, illuminating the psychological factors at play.
- Patchen’s exploratory framework emphasizes the variability of motivation across different employee groups, underscoring the need for tailored assessments.
ch21BASES OF POWER
In examining the varying sources of power within organizations, this chapter reveals how autonomy and centralization influence individual authority and performance dynamics.
- Power is not merely a function of position; rather, it is fundamentally about the ability to inspire and engage others through various bases of influence.
- Bachman’s findings suggest that fostering expertise and personal attractiveness can enhance satisfaction and collaboration among faculty.
- Acknowledging and leveraging the distinct bases of power can fundamentally alter the dynamics of organizational influence.
- Ethical leadership should aim to prioritize respect, competence, and inclusivity over fear or coercive tactics, especially in academic settings.
ch22ROUTINIZATION
Routinization quantifies how repetitive role performance varies across occupations, influencing social structure and organizational behavior. This chapter argues that the degree of routinization is a critical, yet often overlooked, aspect of both blue-collar and white-collar work environments.
ch23SATISFACTION
This chapter defines satisfaction as the degree of positive affect that members of a social system feel towards their organization, highlighting its multidimensionality and implications for organizational structure.
- Satisfaction is a complex, multifaceted concept that varies significantly across different dimensions within social systems.
- The interplay between satisfiers and dissatisfiers highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of employee experiences in organizations.
- Measurement tools should reflect the multidimensional nature of satisfaction to be truly effective; established measures have varying approaches worth exploring.
- The relationship between satisfaction and cohesion is integral, as strong social bonds within teams contribute to overall satisfaction.
ch24SUCCESSION
Succession in organizations encapsulates the movement of individuals through roles, emphasizing both internal promotions and external turnover, and demonstrating the profound impact on organizational dynamics.
- Succession is a nuanced process that includes both internal role transitions and external turnover.
- Recognizing and addressing the complexities of organizational succession is crucial for maintaining operational continuity.
- Internal promotions should be valued equally with external appointments to fully grasp the dynamics of workforce management.
- Effective succession planning encompasses a comprehensive understanding of both qualitative and quantitative data regarding personnel movement.
ch25CONCLUSION
The chapter proposes actionable strategies to enhance the measurement frameworks used in organizational studies, emphasizing the importance of clarity, standardization, and continued research.
- Organizational research suffers from a lack of precise concepts, leading to confusion in the interpretation and application of findings.
- The Ohio State studies exemplify the consequences of vague definitions, which inhibit the effective use of leadership measures.
- Clarity and precision in theoretical constructs are paramount for advancing the field of organizational studies.
- Continuous standardization of measures can significantly improve both the validity and reliability of research outcomes.
Related in the library