peopleanalyst

library / libe1fca3a04aee1d7b

Competing with flexible lateral organizations

Galbraith, Jay R, Galbraith etc. · 1994

In a sentence

Organizations gain sustainable competitive advantage by building lateral organizational capability—the ability to coordinate across functions, business units, and countries—matched carefully to the coordination requirements of their strategy.

Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations argues that in an increasingly uncertain, global, and time-compressed business world, the organization itself becomes a hard-to-copy competitive weapon. Galbraith shows that traditional sources of advantage erode quickly, so companies must build 'lateral capability'—the capacity to make general management decisions across organizational units without routing everything through the hierarchy. Drawing on the Star Model and decades of consulting with firms like Boeing, Dow-Corning, Hewlett-Packard, SKF, NEC, and Cathay Pacific, the book presents a menu of lateral organizational forms (voluntary networks, formal groups, integrators, matrix, and distributed organizations) that vary in cost and difficulty. Its central discipline: diagnose how much cross-unit coordination your strategy requires, then deploy only as much lateral organization as needed—no more, no less. The book teaches managers how to build the underlying capability over time through rotation, co-location, information technology, aligned rewards, and planning processes, so flexibility can be summoned when strategy demands it.

The four lenses

  • Science
  • Statistics
  • Systems
  • Strategy

The model

A framework linking strategy-driven coordination requirements and organizational design levers (Star Model elements and lateral forms) to psychological/behavioral states of cross-unit coordination and integration, producing organizational flexibility and competitive advantage.

Strategy-Driven Coordination Requirementscontextual condition

The volume and type of cross-unit coordination demanded by a firm's business, corporate, and international strategy, arising from diversity, change, interdependence, global integration, global dispersion, and value-added ambitions.

Product and Market Diversitycontextual condition

The degree to which a business unit produces multiple products or services delivered to multiple customer segments, consuming scarce general management time and requiring cross-functional coordination.

Time Compression / Cycle-Time Pressurecontextual condition

The strategic pressure to reduce time-to-market, order cycle times, and product development schedules, which removes buffers and dramatically increases interdependence among functions requiring tight lateral coordination.

Global Integration Requirementcontextual condition

The degree to which a business must formulate and execute a single globally integrated strategy across countries, driven by high fixed costs, homogeneous markets, universal products, and global customers and competitors.

Global Dispersioncontextual condition

The degree to which value-adding activities (manufacturing, R&D, headquarters) are spread across many countries, driven by active local governments demanding value-added and the search for best sites and skills.

Corporate Value Added / Portfolio Relatednesscontextual condition

The amount and type of value a corporation adds to its business units and the relatedness of the business portfolio, which together determine the need for cross-business-unit lateral coordination.

Star Model Alignment (Capability-Building Levers)design lever

The degree to which the organizational design levers—structure, management processes, rewards and incentives, and human resource/people practices—are aligned with each other and with the task to support performance.

Human Resource / People Practicesdesign lever

Practices including interdependent rotation, cross-cultural training, selection of team players and generalists, and skill-based pay used to develop people who can work laterally and influence without authority.

Co-location and Interdepartmental Eventsdesign lever

Design actions—physical proximity of interdependent groups and shared training, meetings, and events—that increase the quantity and quality of cross-departmental communication and relationship formation.

Information Technology Networksdesign lever

Electronic mail, groupware, shared databases, and telecom networks that connect people across time, space, hierarchy, and departments, enabling communication and coordination independent of location.

Consistent Rewards and Measurement Systemsdesign lever

Overarching, aligned goal measures (e.g., Total Delivered Cost, cycle time, Break Even Time, route profitability) and reward practices that align interests across units and channel informal networks toward company goals.

Type and Amount of Lateral Organization Deployeddesign lever

The escalating repertoire of lateral mechanisms deployed—voluntary organization, formal groups (simple, multidimensional, hierarchical), integrating roles, matrix, and distributed organization—varying in cost and management time required.

Integrator Power Base and Influencedesign lever

The influence an integrating role can exert without formal authority, shaped by structure, staffing, status, information systems, planning processes, rewards, responsibilities, budgets, and dual authority.

Lateral Organizational Capabilitybehavioral pattern

The consistently and effectively executed ability of an organization to coordinate general management decisions across organizational units, built when all Star Model elements are aligned in the relevant part of the organization.

Voluntary Communication and Informal Networksbehavioral pattern

The spontaneous, self-initiated cross-unit relationships and communication created as a by-product of rotation, co-location, IT, and events, forming the foundation for lateral coordination.

Cross-Unit Integration and Coordinationpsychological state

The achieved state of aligned, coordinated action across organizational units—resolving conflicts and marshaling resources on a shared issue—which is the ultimate purpose of the lateral organization.

Decision Speed and Qualitybehavioral pattern

The capacity of the organization to make more, faster, and higher-quality decisions of different types by decentralizing choice to groups at the point of product and customer contact.

Organizational Flexibility and Multidimensionalitybehavioral pattern

The capacity to organize around any issue and respond quickly to multiple constituencies and changing situations without reorganizing, promoting learning and continuous strategic adjustment.

Sustainable Competitive Advantageoutcome metric

The lasting, hard-to-copy market advantage derived from organizational capability—especially lateral capability—that enables superior coordination, speed, and flexibility in serving customers.

Coordination Cost (Management Time and Conflict)outcome metric

The investment in management time spent communicating and deciding across units, plus increased conflict, that accompanies lateral organization and can exceed benefits if overused.

How they connect

  • product market diversity predicts strategy coordination requirements
  • time compression predicts strategy coordination requirements
  • global integration predicts strategy coordination requirements
  • global dispersion predicts strategy coordination requirements
  • corporate value added predicts strategy coordination requirements
  • strategy coordination requirements predicts lateral form intensity
  • star model alignment predicts lateral capability
  • human resource practices predicts voluntary communication networks
  • co location and events predicts voluntary communication networks
  • information technology networks predicts voluntary communication networks
  • consistent rewards measurement predicts cross unit integration
  • voluntary communication networks predicts lateral capability
  • lateral form intensity influences integrator power base
  • integrator power base predicts cross unit integration
  • lateral capability predicts cross unit integration
  • cross unit integration predicts decision speed and quality
  • cross unit integration predicts organizational flexibility
  • decision speed and quality predicts competitive advantage
  • organizational flexibility predicts competitive advantage
  • lateral form intensity predicts coordination cost
  • coordination cost moderates competitive advantage
  • strategy coordination requirements mediates competitive advantage

The story

The reader A manager or organization designer who wants to compete effectively and respond flexibly to a rapidly changing, global, uncertain marketplace.

External problem

Traditional sources of competitive advantage erode quickly, and the hierarchy alone cannot coordinate the growing volume of cross-functional, cross-business, and cross-country decisions the strategy demands.

Internal problem

The manager feels overwhelmed by conflict, slow decisions, missed opportunities, and the frustration that teams and matrix structures seem to fail more often than they succeed.

Philosophical problem

It is simply wrong to treat organization as a necessary evil or to believe good people alone make any structure work—flexible, coordinated capability is what wins.

The plan

  1. Diagnose the coordination requirements implied by your business, corporate, and international strategy.
  2. Match the type and amount of lateral organization (voluntary, formal groups, integrators, matrix, distributed) to those requirements.
  3. Build lateral capability by aligning Star Model elements—rotate people, co-locate, deploy information technology, align rewards.
  4. Create formal groups and integrating roles only where the voluntary organization is insufficient.
  5. Manage the lateral process: set strategy foundation, build capability, design groups, and review performance.

Success

  • The company makes more and better decisions faster, closer to customers.
  • The organization becomes multidimensional and flexible, responsive to many constituencies without constant reorganization.
  • A cadre of managers who can influence without authority creates a hard-to-copy competitive advantage.
  • The firm learns and changes faster, with a built-in voice for change.

At stake

  • Missed opportunities and eroded market share as competitors coordinate faster.
  • Matrix and team efforts collapse into dysfunctional conflict for lack of capability.
  • Excessive coordination costs and complications from using more lateral organization than needed.
  • Inability to respond to global integration, time compression, and value-added demands.

Questions this book answers

Why has organizational capability become a sustainable source of competitive advantage?
What is lateral organization and how does it differ from vertical hierarchy?
How do different strategies generate different amounts and types of lateral coordination requirements?
What are the different types and amounts of lateral organization, and how do you match them to strategy?
How does management build lateral organizational capability over time?

Glossary

Strategy-Driven Coordination Requirements
The volume and type of cross-unit coordination that a firm's business, corporate, and international strategy demands.
Product and Market Diversity
The degree of variety in products/services and customer segments served by a business unit.
Time Compression / Cycle-Time Pressure
Strategic pressure to reduce the time to develop, produce, and deliver products and services.
Global Integration Requirement
The degree to which a business requires a single, globally coordinated strategy across countries.
Global Dispersion
The extent to which value-adding activities are spread across many countries.
Corporate Value Added / Portfolio Relatedness
The amount and type of value a corporation adds to its business units and the relatedness of its portfolio.
Star Model Alignment (Capability-Building Levers)
The degree of consistency among structure, processes, rewards, and people practices in support of the target task.
Human Resource / People Practices
Practices that develop and select people capable of working laterally and influencing without authority.

Related in the library