Overview
What this research program is and why it exists. The frame the rest of the work hangs on.
research / vela
A contemplative platform that is four things at once — an Image System (player + Reveal + composites), a five-layer Written System (analytical essays · Mosaic testimony · fiction · readings · submissions), a Narrative Intelligence Platform (three-domain editorial spine), and an Adaptive Authorship substrate. Research probes desire dimensions, compositional features, temporal dynamics, and individual differences — with a deliberately rigorous bibliography, preregistered protocols, and a /study research program staged behind first-pass instrument validation.
Why this matters
The portable claim — what this research lets you understand outside the surface domain.
On its surface, Vela's research is figurative-art response. Underneath, it is an instrument: how does desire — move-toward — separate from preference (like)? How do compositional features mediate response? How stable are individual differences? The methods generalize. They speak to consumer-behavior research, aesthetic measurement methodology, taste calibration in any high-volume domain, and the design of adaptive measurement instruments well outside HR. The corpus is fine art; the questions are general.
Read first
The general-audience explainer is the entry point. Everything below is the drill-down.
General-audience entry point into the Vela research program.
Read →Drill-down — full research surface
Seven-slot baseline. Forthcoming slots shown openly.
Overview
What this research program is and why it exists. The frame the rest of the work hangs on.
Methodology
How the work is done — instruments, protocols, the standards each report inherits.
Reports
The actual research findings — phased results, research-question briefs, applied analyses.
What separates desire (move-toward) from preference (like) in figurative response.
Which compositional features mediate response, and how do they interact.
How desire moves over a session and across sessions.
Which dimensions of variance separate participants and how stable they are.
Field positioning across the desire / aesthetic / measurement literature.
First-volume analysis of the desire-index instrument.
Literature review for the Christianity / sex / shame thread.
A research note synthesizing the historical case.
How the tradition reads itself across centuries.
An across-the-corpus reading of Augustine on the body, sex, and shame.
Literature review for the text-aesthetic thread.
Program proposal for the Boudoir Studios research initiative.
Methodological notes for the Warhol artist study.
Notes on the emotion-corpus expansion plan.
Bootstrap of the thread. Three sub-questions: (a) museum-vs-museum corpus differences, (b) museum vs. its primary serving location, (c) temporal change using artwork creation dates. Analysis of (a) is queued at ASN-981.
Cross-museum comparison of how cultural and physical diversity of beauty is represented. Three sub-questions: (a) museum-vs-museum corpus differences, (b) museum vs. its primary audience location, (c) how representation has shifted over time using artwork dates. Forthcoming write-up; questions doc is the live entry above.
Audience tiers
The same headline research surfaced four ways: peer-review, engineering, general audience, product.
General-audience entry point into the Vela research program.
A senior referee's review of the christianity-sex-shame literature review and supporting documents, written for a psychology-of-religion / history-of-Christianity outlet.
Staff-engineer review of the corpus pipeline that produces the christianity-sex-shame research outputs — dual-grade ingestion, retrieval against thinly-curated sources, and reproducibility of the synthesis chain.
Product strategist's read on what the christianity-sex-shame research tells Vela to build next — content-warning UX, member recruitment messaging, the theological-coherence intervention as a /study module, and how the player should adapt for high-religiosity participants.
Architecture and instrument design from an engineering reviewer's lens.
What the research tells us to build next.
Headline findings positioned for academic peer review.
Bibliography
Field positioning — formal references and literature maps grounding the research threads.
Map of the field across the major Vela research threads.
Master bibliography in BibTeX form.
Forthcoming — field positioning for the diversity-of-beauty thread.
Preregistrations & protocols
Studies and intervention protocols filed before execution.
Pipeline
What is running, what is queued, what is forthcoming.
Where the research program sits relative to thesis-grade readiness.
Studies queued for design and execution.
How the research program connects to recruitment and publication.
Hand-curated snapshot of running / queued / blocked / recently completed / coming soon across the Vela research program.