← HR Metrics·Engagement & Retention
Engagement Index
Composite engagement score from multiple survey dimensions
How it’s computed
WEIGHTED_AVG(engagement_dimensions)
What the evidence shows
| Relates to | Effect (r) | N | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organizational commitment | 0.617 | 131837 | A |
| Job satisfaction | 0.586 | 433684 | A |
| Task performance | 0.455 | 84331 | A |
| Turnover intention | -0.448 | 29832 | B |
| Contextual performance | 0.34 | 3654 | A |
| Organizational citizenship behavior ocb | 0.34 | 3654 | A |
| Voluntary turnover | -0.2 | 1408 | A |
Run it on your data
This metric is computed in the People Analytics Toolbox on your own numbers. See pricing — posted, no quotes.
sources: toolbox:metrics-catalog · principia:metrics
What the literature says
The measurement literature behind this signal — sourced, so you can defend it.
“Between-organization range-restriction corrections are relevant in understanding how engagement relates to performance across the business/work units of all organizations. As alluded to, we have applied the indirect range-restriction correction procedure to this meta-analysis…”
— First Break All the Rulesmatch 58%
“In other words, business/work units with high employee engagement nearly double their odds of above-average composite performance in their own organizations and increase their odds for above-average success across business/work units in all organizations by 2.1 times. [image…”
— First Break All the Rulesmatch 57%
“Further to the right are a series of attitudes, behaviors, and consequences that are theorized to be mediated by engagement. (You can find sample engagement survey item variations in this book's Appendix B.) [image "“Illustration of a general engagement model depicting the…”
— People Analytics For Dummiesmatch 56%
Resources: First Break All the Rules · People Analytics For Dummies