← HR Metrics·Performance & Development
Training Completion Rate
Percentage of assigned training completed
How it’s computed
COUNT(completed) / COUNT(assigned)
What the evidence shows
| Relates to | Effect (r) | N | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training performance | 0.581 | 30462 | A |
| Task performance | 0.482 | 17363 | A |
| Organizational performance | 0.152 | 75083 | A |
What this metric can show you
Training Completion Rate can tell roughly 26 pre-built stories — each a designed scene the data either confirms or it doesn’t. Bring your numbers and the Story Finder runs every one of these shapes against them.
specific to performance & development
It's two companies, split by manager
leadership-quality · T1
Most are fine — a tail is struggling
engagement · T1
The system isn't differentiating
measurement-health · T1
You've quietly stopped promoting from within
development-mobility · T1
Your ratings are compressing
performance · T1
Analytical culture → fact-based decision-making
cams · T2
Engaged employees apply discretionary effort → workforce productivity rises
engagement · T2
Intrinsic motivation → performance
engagement · T2
universal shapes — any single metric can take these
A few large values are doing the talking
any focus · T1
A one-time event, not a trend
any focus · T1
It doesn't track — the premise is false
any focus · T1
It's concentrated — one group stands apart
any focus · T1
Scenes are pre-built; your data is the toggle. Browse the full deck or watch one play end-to-end in The Quiet Exodus.
Run it on your data
This metric is computed in the People Analytics Toolbox on your own numbers. See pricing — posted, no quotes.
sources: toolbox:metrics-catalog · principia:metrics
What the literature says
The measurement literature behind this signal — sourced, so you can defend it.
“3) Percentage work time spend on tasks (how much learning was actually applied) The percentages of each question are multiplied together, then adjusted downward by 35 per cent (i.e. multiplied by 65 per cent) to factor for response bias and overestimation - a process called…”
— Predictive HR Analyticsmatch 49%
“But most companies wants to know more than just participation rates - they also want to measure quality of training, which is measured in the other levels.Level 1 - Reaction, Satisfaction, and Planned Application: Level 1 measures participants’ satisfaction with a program. Most…”
— Predictive HR Analyticsmatch 47%
“Employee’s performance Below Expectation Meets Expectation Above Expectation Employee's pay relative to market (salary market- ratio) Below 80% Flight risk 80%-89% Flight risk 90%-109% 110%-119% 120% & above 22) Training & Development Analytics In an organization context,…”
— Predictive HR Analyticsmatch 47%
Resources: Predictive HR Analytics