Overview
What this research program is and why it exists. The frame the rest of the work hangs on.
research / arc / aesthetic-response
How does desire (move-toward) separate from preference (like) in figurative response? Compositional features, temporal dynamics, individual-difference structure, museum-corpus diversity, and the artist-study programs that take specific bodies of work seriously as research instruments.
Why this matters
The portable claim — what this arc lets you understand outside the surface domain.
On the surface, fine-art figurative response. Underneath, an instrument: the methods generalize to consumer-behavior research, aesthetic measurement methodology, taste calibration in any high-volume domain, and the design of adaptive measurement instruments well outside HR. The corpus is fine art because the signal is rich; the questions are general.
Spans
Products this arc cuts through. Each application is sometimes the lead empirical apparatus, sometimes the funding/data-collection platform.
Read first
The general-audience entry point for this arc. Drill down below for the full set.
General-audience entry point into the Vela research program.
Read →Drill-down — full arc surface
Cross-product. Source application shown on each entry.
Overview
What this research program is and why it exists. The frame the rest of the work hangs on.
Methodology
How the work is done — instruments, protocols, the standards each report inherits.
Reports
The actual research findings — phased results, research-question briefs, applied analyses.
What separates desire (move-toward) from preference (like) in figurative response.
Which compositional features mediate response, and how do they interact.
How desire moves over a session and across sessions.
Which dimensions of variance separate participants and how stable they are.
Field positioning across the desire / aesthetic / measurement literature.
First-volume analysis of the desire-index instrument.
Literature review for the text-aesthetic thread.
Program proposal for the Boudoir Studios research initiative.
Methodological notes for the Warhol artist study.
Notes on the emotion-corpus expansion plan.
Bootstrap of the thread. Three sub-questions: (a) museum-vs-museum corpus differences, (b) museum vs. its primary serving location, (c) temporal change using artwork creation dates. Analysis of (a) is queued at ASN-981.
Cross-museum comparison of how cultural and physical diversity of beauty is represented. Three sub-questions: (a) museum-vs-museum corpus differences, (b) museum vs. its primary audience location, (c) how representation has shifted over time using artwork dates. Forthcoming write-up; questions doc is the live entry above.
Audience tiers
The same headline research surfaced four ways: peer-review, engineering, general audience, product.
General-audience entry point into the Vela research program.
Headline findings positioned for academic peer review.
Bibliography
Field positioning — formal references and literature maps grounding the research threads.
Map of the field across the major Vela research threads.
Forthcoming — field positioning for the diversity-of-beauty thread.
Preregistrations & protocols
Studies and intervention protocols filed before execution.